<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Not Geeky!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notgeeky.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notgeeky.com</link>
	<description>I bet it's really geeky. No it isnt! Not Geeky at all!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Voipstunt vs Skype</title>
		<link>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/06/11/voipstunt-vs-skype/</link>
		<comments>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/06/11/voipstunt-vs-skype/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edwin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[VOIP]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[phone2phone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Skype]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Voipstunt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notgeeky.com/?p=663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lately I have been using both Skype and Voipstunt. I do have to Skype&#8217;s version 4.0 is a lot better than the old one. In some areas Voipstunt does win, but not in all!
For your convenience I came up with several. This should make it easier for a voip caller to make a decision on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lately I have been using both Skype and Voipstunt. I do have to Skype&#8217;s version 4.0 is a lot better than the old one. In some areas Voipstunt does win, but not in all!</p>
<p>For your convenience I came up with several. This should make it easier for a voip caller to make a decision on what to use or even better, what to use when.</p>
<p><strong>1. PC to PC</strong><br />
When you&#8217;re making calls from your PC to another PC Skype is the better option. It is possible using Voipstunt, however it seems to take too much of your computer resources. To be honest: for this I prefer Google Talk. <a href="http://www.google.com/talk">Google Talk</a> is a small application and the sound quality is excellent.</p>
<p><strong>2. </strong><strong>Phone to Phone</strong><br />
In some countries Skype offers phone to phone calls. In most it doesn&#8217;t. And if it does it still requires you to have a monthly subscription, which is not needed with Voipstunt. In addition Voipstunt offers various ways to initiate a phone to phone call.</p>
<p><strong>3. Dropping Calls</strong><br />
Skype is way more prone to drop calls,which I found really annoying. In this area I hardly have any issues with Voipstunt.</p>
<p><strong>4. Firewall Issues </strong><br />
Skype manages to get through Firewalls a lot better than Voipstunt. So if you are in a particular area where you can&#8217;t make voipstunt work, you probably can make your call using Skype.</p>
<p><strong>5. Mobile to Phone</strong><br />
See also item 2. With Voipstunt, If you do it the smart way you can program your phone in such a way it dials the number for you. In addition there are all sorts of mobile client tools that can help you reducing the costs. In the UK you have the 3 network that offers similar functionality on your mobile, however this is only in the UK.</p>
<p><strong>6. Echo Cancellation</strong><br />
Skype has better Echo cancellation overall. In some cases Voipstunt echoes a lot, to the point where it becomes really annoying. This can  depend on your configuration, destination and time of day.</p>
<p><strong>7. Costs to Landlines</strong><br />
Voipstunt is way cheaper than Skype, both to landlines and mobiles. Voipstunt is often, not always, free, Skype just isn&#8217;t. With Skype you can reduce the costs by having a subscription, but only if you make phonecalls for hours and hours per day this will be cheaper than Voipstunt. (2.95GBP to one country a month, only landlines)</p>
<p><strong>8. Voicemail</strong><br />
Voipstunt doesn&#8217;t offer Voicemail facilities. You can forward calls when you are not on line. Skype does offer Voicemail. Voicemail is included with the purchase of any of their <a href="http://www.skype.com/allfeatures/subscriptions/">subscriptions</a> or $20 for a full year.</p>
<p><strong>9. Video</strong><br />
Skype has video calling build in, Voipstunt doesn&#8217;t. If you use X-lite combined Voipstunt it is apparently possible. Still Skype remains the easiest option.</p>
<p><strong>10. Caller ID</strong><br />
Recently Skype started offering Caller ID services (free). More and more people first look on their phone to see who is calling. Some don&#8217;t even answer the phone if there is no caller ID (like me). With Skype you can set it up and upon verification and aproval it is attached to your account. With Voipstunt you can quite easily set a whole bunch of phone numbers (verification is required) or switch it (temporarily) off. With phone 2 phone calls you cannot always switch it off. In some cases it doesn&#8217;t work (Nokia N810) at all with Voipstunt. Funily enough Skype Caller ID does work on my Nokia N810.</p>
<p><strong>11. Sending Text Messages</strong><br />
Voipstunt has very low priced text messaging service Skype offers it as well, but it is more expensive. With Voipstunt you can also send your text messages from their website or by using one of the many third party tools.</p>
<p><strong>12. Inbound phonenumber</strong><br />
Both Skype and Voipstunt offer inbound phonenumbers. However, it really depends on the country. In some countries I would say Skype is the better choice, in others Voipstunt is. In the UK you can get an inbound number, which isn&#8217;t recognizable as such. In Holland for instance Skype doesn&#8217;t offer an inbound number whereas Voipstunt does. The downside is that the number looks a bit awkward, because it begins with 0857.</p>
<p><strong>13. Games</strong><br />
Skype offers some games that you can play with your kids online when you are abroad. Nice feature.</p>
<p><img src="http://notgeeky.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/voipstuntvsskype1-300x199.jpg" alt="voipstuntvsskype1" title="voipstuntvsskype1" width="300" height="199" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-686" /></p>
<p>Hope you found this info useful. </p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Edwin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/06/11/voipstunt-vs-skype/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voipstunt: Inbound Numbers in Holland for one Euro</title>
		<link>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/05/12/voipstunt-inbound-numbers-in-holland-for-one-euro/</link>
		<comments>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/05/12/voipstunt-inbound-numbers-in-holland-for-one-euro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edwin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[VOIP]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[inbound phone number]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Voipstunt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notgeeky.com/?p=657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to let you know: Lot&#8217;s of Voipstunt users have been waiting for this for ages. I just found out Voipstunt is offering inbound numbers again, 085 numbers that is. Price 1 euro, that&#8217;s almost for free! Get there while the offer lasts!
FYI: Phoning a Dutch 085 number is just as expensive as phoning a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to let you know: Lot&#8217;s of Voipstunt users have been waiting for this for ages. I just found out Voipstunt is offering inbound numbers again, 085 numbers that is. Price 1 euro, that&#8217;s almost for free! Get there while the offer lasts!</p>
<p>FYI: Phoning a Dutch 085 number is just as expensive as phoning a Dutch landline&#8230;</p>
<p>Edwin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/05/12/voipstunt-inbound-numbers-in-holland-for-one-euro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voipstunt: How it works for me&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/05/01/voipstunt-how-it-works-for-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/05/01/voipstunt-how-it-works-for-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 09:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edwin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[VOIP]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[How to make cheap phonecalls]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[phone2phone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Voipstunt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notgeeky.com/?p=645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(this article has been published before by me in a slightly different form on Squidoo)
 
When I discovered this a couple of years ago I thought this was simply too good to be true. Using VOIP, even without my PC, I can make free phone calls or send text messages for 5 cents. OK, I&#8217;ll [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<address>(this article has been published before by me in a slightly different form on Squidoo)</address>
<address> </address>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-646" title="voip1" src="http://notgeeky.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/voip1.jpg" alt="voip1" width="116" height="117" />When I discovered this a couple of years ago I thought this was simply too good to be true. Using VOIP, even without my PC, I can make free phone calls or send text messages for 5 cents. OK, I&#8217;ll be honest sometimes a call costs me just a bit more. The weird thing is though I can hardly find any info on it on the internet. So I thought I might as well share this knowledge here&#8230;.</p>
<p>I love VOIP. It saves me a lot of money, is convenient and allows me to make phone calls I wouldn&#8217;t make if it didn&#8217;t exist merely because of the costs. I make a lot of international phone calls. I live in country A and some of my clients in country B and so does a major part of my family.</p>
<p>How do I VOIP? I&#8217;m not using Skype, Fring, Vonage, BT or what have you. Nope, I make use of Voipstunt. And no, I&#8217;m not using a headset, computer microphone or Voipbox but just a regular phone, or in VOIP lingo: Phone2phone calls.</p>
<p>This has 2 major advantages: You do not need to have access to a PC and, even more importantly, the sound quality is really good. This is often not the case when you use a headset attached to the computer.</p>
<p>When I&#8217;m in my car I use an Access number and when I&#8217;m home I sometimes use a PC. I can make calls, using my mobile, often completely free of charge. (It depends on how many minutes I&#8217;ve used in the last 7 days). When I&#8217;m at home I often make use of the VOIPStunt application running on my PC and I can make phonecalls for 5 Eurocents per hour. Another major advantage is you can use VOIPStunt without a subscription.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-647" title="voip2" src="http://notgeeky.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/voip2.jpg" alt="voip2" width="128" height="154" />It&#8217;s all very simple:<br />
1. <a href="http://www.voipstunt.com/download">Download Voipstunt</a>. It&#8217;s a small application for windows (only) and can be found here<br />
2. Create a user (first screen) and buy credits. You can start with a tiny amount, depending on which country you live in. I usually credit buy for 10 Euro&#8217;s.<br />
3. Fill out your personal details. Most important is your landline- and mobile number. You&#8217;ll get a textmessage (SMS) or talking computer call for verification purposes.</p>
<p>After you&#8217;ve completed your registration you can start calling. Basically, Phone2phone call wise, you&#8217;ve got 2 options:</p>
<ul>
<li>Use an Access number, best used from mobile to landline</li>
<li>Use your computer, best used from landline to landline</li>
</ul>
<p>Note: You have to type in the complete phonenumber including the country code, so 0044 or +44 for the UK, 0032 or +32 for Belgium etc.</p>
<p><strong>Use an Access number</strong><br />
First you need to lookup the Access number in your area. Go to your VOIPStunt application and click on here to go to your account page. Click in your webbrowser on Make VOIP Calls from your fixed/mobile phone. The nearest Access number can be looked up now.</p>
<ul>
<li>Dial the Access number</li>
<li>Dial the phonenumber you wish to call and finish with the # sign.</li>
<li>A computer voice will tell you about the calling costs. Phoning a landline abroad is, in my case, usually 0 cents.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Use your Computer</strong><br />
Go to your VOIPStunt application</p>
<ul>
<li> Click on the Phone2Phone tab</li>
<li>Select the phonenumber you want to call from (Landline or mobile)</li>
<li>Type in the number you wish to call</li>
<li>Click on the Call button</li>
<li>Pick up the phone</li>
<li>On your screen the calling costs will appear. Phoning a landline abroad is, in my case, usually 5 cents.</li>
<li>You can call now for one 1 hour for a small amount, in my case 5 cents.</li>
</ul>
<p>Edwin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/05/01/voipstunt-how-it-works-for-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ms Access: Unicode Compression through code</title>
		<link>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/04/30/ms-access-unicode-compression-through-code/</link>
		<comments>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/04/30/ms-access-unicode-compression-through-code/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edwin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[MsOffice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[AllowZeroLength through code]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ms Access]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Set Required through code]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Unicode Compression through code]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[VBA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notgeeky.com/?p=633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once every now and then I&#8217;m called by a client to tart up an old Ms Access Database up. Quite often it needs to be normalised and almost even so often it becomes a lot smaller after a repair and compact.
One other thing that bugged me was that the Unicode Compression was often not set [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://notgeeky.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/ms-access-20032.jpg" alt="ms-access-20032" title="ms-access-20032" width="50" height="50" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-638" />Once every now and then I&#8217;m called by a client to tart up an old Ms Access Database up. Quite often it needs to be normalised and almost even so often it becomes a lot smaller after a repair and compact.</p>
<p>One other thing that bugged me was that the Unicode Compression was often not set for the field and therefore the data was taking up a lot more space than strictly neccessary. If you try to alter this by hand you get an error message saying it can&#8217;t change the datatype due to lack of memory or diskspace.</p>
<p>If you try it using VBA however there is no problem whatsoever&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Option Compare Database</p>
<p>Public Sub SetTableField(ByVal strTableName As String, _<br />
ByVal strFieldName As String, _<br />
ByVal strProperty As String, _<br />
ByVal vntState As Variant, _<br />
Optional ByVal vntDatabasePathAndName As Variant)</p>
<p>Dim tdfTableDef As DAO.TableDef<br />
Dim dbsThisDatabase As DAO.Database</p>
<p>On Error GoTo ErrorHandler</p>
<p>&#8216;If the Database Path/Name was NOT passed&#8230;<br />
If IsMissing(vntDatabasePathAndName) Then<br />
    &#8216;Get a pointer to the local Database.<br />
    Set dbsThisDatabase = CurrentDb()<br />
Else<br />
    &#8216;Get a pointer to the linked Database.<br />
    Set dbsThisDatabase = DBEngine.Workspaces(0).OpenDatabase(vntDatabasePathAndName)<br />
End If</p>
<p>&#8216;Set a pointer to that Table&#8217;s definitions in that Database.<br />
Set tdfTableDef = dbsThisDatabase.TableDefs(strTableName)</p>
<p>&#8216;Operate on the Property of that Table in that Database.<br />
tdfTableDef.Fields(strFieldName).Properties(strProperty) = vntState</p>
<p>ExitProcedure:<br />
&#8216;Set error handling off, we can&#8217;t afford another error here.<br />
On Error Resume Next<br />
Set tdfTableDef = Nothing<br />
Set dbsThisDatabase = Nothing<br />
Exit Sub</p>
<p>ErrorHandler:<br />
MsgBox &#8220;Error in Sub SetTableField&#8221; &#038; vbNewLine &#038; &#8220;Module mdlGlobal&#8221; &#038; vbNewLine &#038; vbNewLine &#038; _<br />
&#8220;Error number : &#8221; &#038; Err.Number &#038; vbNewLine &#038; _<br />
&#8220;Error description : &#8221; &#038; Err.Description</p>
<p>Resume ExitProcedure</p>
<p>End Sub<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Use :</p>
<p>SetTableField &#8220;Table&#8221;, &#8220;FieldName&#8221;, &#8220;UnicodeCompression&#8221;, True</p>
<p>and presto!</p>
<p>Moreover you can use this code also for removing/applying some restrictions on the fields:</p>
<p>eg</p>
<p>SetTableField &#8220;Table&#8221;, &#8220;FieldName&#8221;, &#8220;AllowZeroLength&#8221;, True</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>SetTableField &#8220;Table&#8221;, &#8220;FieldName&#8221;, &#8220;Required&#8221;, True</p>
<p>(Replace &#8220;Table&#8221; with your own table and &#8220;FieldName&#8221; with your own field)</p>
<p>So if you want to apply this to all the textfields in a table, you can use this:</p>
<p>Sub SetUnicodeTrueForAll(StrTable As String)</p>
<p>    Dim Rs As Recordset</p>
<p>    On Error GoTo Err</p>
<p>    Set Rs = CurrentDb.OpenRecordset(StrTable)</p>
<p>    With Rs<br />
        For IntI = 0 To .Fields.Count - 1<br />
            If .Fields(IntI).Type = dbText Then<br />
                SetTableField StrTable, .Fields(IntI).Name, &#8220;UnicodeCompression&#8221;, True<br />
            End If<br />
        Next<br />
    End With</p>
<p>Sub_Exit:<br />
    Rs.Close<br />
    Exit Sub</p>
<p>Err:<br />
    MsgBox Error$<br />
    Resume Next</p>
<p>End Sub</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/04/30/ms-access-unicode-compression-through-code/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watching television in and from the UK</title>
		<link>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/04/25/watching-television-in-and-from-the-uk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/04/25/watching-television-in-and-from-the-uk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edwin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Television for Expats]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TV for Expats]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[watch BBC abroad]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Watch BBC on-line]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[watch Dave on-line]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[watch movies on-line]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Watch television from the UK]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Watching television on-line]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notgeeky.com/?p=312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not even that long ago, in the summer of 2007, the BBC started distributing their beta version of IPlayer . I subscribed, and was &#8216;invited&#8217; to download their iPlayer. These days however it is a lot easier, to just browse to the BBC website and watch the program from there. No need to download,  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not even that long ago, in the summer of 2007, the BBC started distributing their beta version of <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/">IPlayer</a> . I subscribed, and was &#8216;invited&#8217; to download their iPlayer. These days however it is a lot easier, to just browse to the <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/">BBC website</a> and watch the program from there. No need to download,  unless you prefer higher quality or want to watch it from a <a href="http://iplayerhelp.external.bbc.co.uk/help/download_programmes/sideloading">portable player</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-316" title="bbciplayer" src="http://notgeeky.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/bbciplayer-300x175.jpg" alt="bbciplayer" width="450" height="263" /></a><br />
Not only the BBC but also <a href="http://www.itv.com/">ITV</a> has an archive of broadcasted programs. On top of that you can watch live programs.   My favorite is Channel 4 though. You can catch-up on one of their <a href="http://www.channel4.com/programmes/catch-up">programs</a> in their 30-day archive.  On top of that they have another huge archive, which requires to download their <a href="http://www.channel4.com/4od/index.html">player</a>. On top of a lot of programs (whole seasons from popular series!!) from the past it also allows you to watch recent movies for a small fee.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.e4.co.uk/"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-316" title="E4" src="http://notgeeky.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/e4-300x176.jpg" alt="E4" width="450" height="263" /></a><br />
However, if you just want to watch live television <a href="http://www.tvcatchup.com">TV Catchup</a> is great. The name is a bit misleading, because all they offer is live television. It&#8217;s 18 different channels though!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tvcatchup.com/"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-316" title="TVCatchup" src="http://notgeeky.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/tvcatchup-300x187.jpg" alt="TVCatchup" width="450" height="263" /></a></p>
<p>Now, if you&#8217;re abroad, or you don&#8217;t live in the UK at all and you want to watch a program from one of these websites you&#8217;ll find that you can&#8217;t, because of your foreign IP address. However if you make use of a UK based Proxy Server this is very well possible. There are lot&#8217;s of free ones, quite often lousy quality, and paid ones such as <a href="http://www.vpngates.com/">VPNGates</a>. For a small monthly fee, this allows you to watch your fav program live. Rumour has it that this works perfectly except for when a new Top Gear Episode is aired.</p>
<p>Enjoy!</p>
<p>Edwin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/04/25/watching-television-in-and-from-the-uk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fonejacker - Internet Service providings</title>
		<link>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/04/16/internet-provider/</link>
		<comments>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/04/16/internet-provider/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edwin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fonejacker]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Service providings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notgeeky.com/?p=588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Priceless&#8230;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- Smart Youtube --><span class="youtube"><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/M8woC9B30zE&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/M8woC9B30zE&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355" ></embed><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /></object></span></p>
<p>Priceless&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/04/16/internet-provider/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ms Access: Switches to debug mode with no error</title>
		<link>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/04/15/ms-access-switches-to-debug-mode-with-no-error/</link>
		<comments>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/04/15/ms-access-switches-to-debug-mode-with-no-error/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edwin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[MsOffice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[code stops]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ms Access]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Switches to debug mode]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notgeeky.com/?p=578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From time to time it happens: Ms Access goes into debug mode without an error. Saving, recompiling, compact/repair, nothing seems to cure the problem. The problem keeps on coming back at the same piece of code. 
What seems to happen is that you can&#8217;t erase a breakpoint that you&#8217;ve created before. Somehow you need to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://notgeeky.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/ms-access-2003.jpg" alt="ms-access-2003" title="ms-access-2003" width="50" height="50" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-580" />From time to time it happens: Ms Access goes into debug mode without an error. Saving, recompiling, compact/repair, nothing seems to cure the problem. The problem keeps on coming back at the same piece of code. </p>
<p>What seems to happen is that you can&#8217;t erase a breakpoint that you&#8217;ve created before. Somehow you need to decompile the code.</p>
<p>A very easy workaround is cut the code subroutine/function where it keeps on breaking, press save and paste the code again. Save and compile the code again. Ms Access will no longer go into debug mode!</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Edwin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/04/15/ms-access-switches-to-debug-mode-with-no-error/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Weller: You do something to me</title>
		<link>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/04/10/paul-weller-you-do-something-to-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/04/10/paul-weller-you-do-something-to-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edwin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Paul Weller]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[You do something to me]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notgeeky.com/?p=574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For A. Cause she kept on asking for this song&#8230;
(Click on the little icon to the left of HQ for full screen)
Paul Weller - You Do Something To Meby Paul-Weller
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For A. Cause she kept on asking for this song&#8230;<br />
(Click on the little icon to the left of HQ for full screen)</p>
<div><object width="420" height="339"><param name="movie" value="http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x8sifn" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x8sifn" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="420" height="339" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always"></embed></object><br /><b><a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x8sifn">Paul Weller - You Do Something To Me</a></b><br /><i>by <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/Paul-Weller">Paul-Weller</a></i></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/04/10/paul-weller-you-do-something-to-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Customizable Post Listings plugin problem</title>
		<link>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/03/25/customizable-post-listings-plugin-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/03/25/customizable-post-listings-plugin-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edwin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[c2c_get_recent_posts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Customizable Post Listings plugin problem]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dutch Date Format]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dutch date format in Wordpress]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Start Blogging with WordPress]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress 2.7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notgeeky.com/?p=516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want to customize your Recent Post listing, one of the most popular Plug ins, is the  c2c_get_recent_posts php function. However, of all the plug-ins that I&#8217;ve tried so far this is definitely not easiest one to use, that is if you use it with WordPress 2.7.  (To be a bit more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to customize your Recent Post listing, one of the most popular Plug ins, is the  <a href="http://coffee2code.com/wp-plugins/#customizablepostlistings">c2c_get_recent_posts php function</a>. However, of all the plug-ins that I&#8217;ve tried so far this is definitely not easiest one to use, that is if you use it with WordPress 2.7.  (To be a bit more specific: I want to be able to show the 5 most recent posts (not pages) , with a date (format mmm-yy) and some text of the post)</p>
<p>I first started making the stupid mistake of forgetting to use some kind of plug-in to execute code in text widgets. So, when I had figured this out I installed <a href="http://bluesome.net/post/2005/08/18/50/">Exec-PHP</a> which made big improvement. (Why is this not a standard WordPress feature?)</p>
<p>However, the next problem was it was showing Pages as Posts so to speak.  Documentation says there should be an option to filter out the pages. However, this doesn&#8217;t seem to work with 2.7. So I tried to filter by specifying the Category. Then I found that you needed the category ID, which isn&#8217;t showing on any of the admin pages. However editing the Category of your choice gives it away: the url shows the Category ID and if that&#8217;s not good enough there always is <a href="http://www.schloebe.de/wordpress/reveal-ids-for-wp-admin-25-plugin/">another plug-in</a>. Unfortunately this functionality is also broken with WordPress 2.7.</p>
<p>Last but not least I wanted to display the beginning of a post, say the first 5 to 10 words of the text. According to the documentation you&#8217;re supposed to use the excerpt function. Unfortunately it&#8217;s showing here the same text (of the first posting) with each post.</p>
<p>What does seem to work though is filtering by user. Once you&#8217;ve figured out which user has which ID you have at least some kind of filtering. I do hope a fix will be released soon. <a href="http://coffee2code.com/about/">Scott, are you there</a>? Please? Pretty, pretty please?</p>
<p>Hopefully I can give you an update soon&#8230;</p>
<p>[Update]<br />
Shame on me!<br />
Today I looked into the problem again. All of a sudden I discovered that I was using version 1.1. My admin panel told me there was a 1.5 available. I downloaded it. However things only got worse. I couldn&#8217;t see any postings anymore. Then I discovered that Scott had already released a version 3.0. But this version is NOT shown if you make use of the standard Plugin browser, you have to go to Scotts homepage!!</p>
<p>SO MAKE SURE YOU INSTALL VERSION 3.0! (if you&#8217;re using WP 2.7)</p>
<p>[Update 2]<br />
Now, just one more thing: Date format in another language (Dutch). I&#8217;ve heard of the setlocale function but I can&#8217;t get it to work&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://downloads.wordpress.org/plugin/dutchdate.zip">Yes this works really well, thanks Barry!</a></p>
<p>Also have a look <a href="http://webscripts.softpedia.com/developer/Barry-Ceelen-1869776480.html">here</a>. For complete Dutchification&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Edwin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/03/25/customizable-post-listings-plugin-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Weller Experiment</title>
		<link>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/03/25/paul-weller-experiment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/03/25/paul-weller-experiment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edwin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Paul Weller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notgeeky.com/?p=532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been playing these 2 cd&#8217;s in my car for ages now. 
 &#38;lt;A HREF=&#8221;http://ws.amazon.com/widgets/q?ServiceVersion=20070822&#38;amp;MarketPlace=US&#38;amp;ID=V20070822%2FUS%2Fnoge-20%2F8014%2Fd2887a67-a6c3-4605-a447-7558a082ef04&#38;amp;Operation=NoScript&#8221; mce_HREF=&#8221;http://ws.amazon.com/widgets/q?ServiceVersion=20070822&#38;amp;amp;MarketPlace=US&#38;amp;amp;ID=V20070822%2FUS%2Fnoge-20%2F8014%2Fd2887a67-a6c3-4605-a447-7558a082ef04&#38;amp;amp;Operation=NoScript&#8221;&#38;gt;Amazon.com Widgets&#38;lt;/A&#38;gt;
  Amazon.com Widgets
If you buy any of these songs at Amazon you&#8217;ll get them at 256 kbps which is slightly better than you would get them from the Itunes store. 
O yeah, the title says experiment. I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been playing these 2 cd&#8217;s in my car for ages now. </p>
<p><object width="336" height="280" data="http://ws.amazon.com/widgets/q?ServiceVersion=20070822&amp;MarketPlace=US&amp;ID=V20070822%2FUS%2Fnoge-20%2F8014%2Fd2887a67-a6c3-4605-a447-7558a082ef04&amp;Operation=GetDisplayTemplate" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="id" value="Player_d2887a67-a6c3-4605-a447-7558a082ef04" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://ws.amazon.com/widgets/q?ServiceVersion=20070822&amp;MarketPlace=US&amp;ID=V20070822%2FUS%2Fnoge-20%2F8014%2Fd2887a67-a6c3-4605-a447-7558a082ef04&amp;Operation=GetDisplayTemplate" /><param name="name" value="Player_d2887a67-a6c3-4605-a447-7558a082ef04" /><param name="align" value="middle" /></object> <noscript>&amp;lt;A HREF=&#8221;http://ws.amazon.com/widgets/q?ServiceVersion=20070822&amp;amp;MarketPlace=US&amp;amp;ID=V20070822%2FUS%2Fnoge-20%2F8014%2Fd2887a67-a6c3-4605-a447-7558a082ef04&amp;amp;Operation=NoScript&#8221; mce_HREF=&#8221;http://ws.amazon.com/widgets/q?ServiceVersion=20070822&amp;amp;amp;MarketPlace=US&amp;amp;amp;ID=V20070822%2FUS%2Fnoge-20%2F8014%2Fd2887a67-a6c3-4605-a447-7558a082ef04&amp;amp;amp;Operation=NoScript&#8221;&amp;gt;Amazon.com Widgets&amp;lt;/A&amp;gt;</noscript></p>
<p><OBJECT classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/swflash.cab" id="Player_5bd85242-feee-4ca4-acb2-e6b0d346ea02"  WIDTH="336px" HEIGHT="280px"> <PARAM NAME="movie" VALUE="http://ws.amazon.com/widgets/q?ServiceVersion=20070822&#038;MarketPlace=US&#038;ID=V20070822%2FUS%2Fnoge-20%2F8014%2F5bd85242-feee-4ca4-acb2-e6b0d346ea02&#038;Operation=GetDisplayTemplate"><PARAM NAME="quality" VALUE="high"><PARAM NAME="bgcolor" VALUE="#FFFFFF"><PARAM NAME="allowscriptaccess" VALUE="always"><embed src="http://ws.amazon.com/widgets/q?ServiceVersion=20070822&#038;MarketPlace=US&#038;ID=V20070822%2FUS%2Fnoge-20%2F8014%2F5bd85242-feee-4ca4-acb2-e6b0d346ea02&#038;Operation=GetDisplayTemplate" id="Player_5bd85242-feee-4ca4-acb2-e6b0d346ea02" quality="high" bgcolor="#ffffff" name="Player_5bd85242-feee-4ca4-acb2-e6b0d346ea02" allowscriptaccess="always"  type="application/x-shockwave-flash" align="middle" height="280px" width="336px"></embed></OBJECT> <NOSCRIPT><A HREF="http://ws.amazon.com/widgets/q?ServiceVersion=20070822&#038;MarketPlace=US&#038;ID=V20070822%2FUS%2Fnoge-20%2F8014%2F5bd85242-feee-4ca4-acb2-e6b0d346ea02&#038;Operation=NoScript">Amazon.com Widgets</A></NOSCRIPT></p>
<p>If you buy any of these songs at Amazon you&#8217;ll get them at 256 kbps which is slightly better than you would get them from the Itunes store. </p>
<p>O yeah, the title says experiment. I just wanted to test a see how easy it is to add this kind of Amazon Associates stuff. I would say just as easy as adding Google Ads to your page. Main benefit is though that this is content wise way more interesting. </p>
<p>My personal fav at the moment is the Strange Museum (2nd album). </p>
<p>And yours?</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Edwin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.notgeeky.com/2009/03/25/paul-weller-experiment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
